
This just about says it all
Hey, there are people who still think crop circles are made by aliens too.

This just about says it all
Hey, there are people who still think crop circles are made by aliens too.
Larry Anderson at the American Thinker hit the nail right on the head
A reporter asks Barak Hussein Obama to the effect “You mocked Hillary Clinton’s lack of forign policy experience during the campaign, now you appoint her Secretary of State, what’s up with that?”
The One responds:
This is fun for the press to try to stir up whatever quotes were generated during the course of the campaign, and you’re having fun. And there’s nothing wrong with that. I’m not faulting it. But, look, I think if you look at the statements that Hillary Clinton and I have made outside of the heat of a campaign, we share a view that America has to be safe and secure, and in order to do that we have to combine military power with strengthened diplomacy.
In other words: “You screwed up, you believed me! I was just talking smack and you took me serious! Who’s the dummy now?”
Again a big thanks to all you morons (data verified by Zogby poll) who voted for this shister. You’ve given me 4 years of material and a HUGE impeachment trial coming up to laugh about.
Yeah, I figured too that if it was stamped with the moniker “Global Warming” the media would be all over it. However this story seems to have slipped through their fingers. There’s two big stories that the main stream media missed, and since they blew it so bad I decided to write the headlines for them:
And
It appears that a lot of scientists just blindly followed the hype on global warming. They signed petitions, they believed the hype, they spoke out in favor of carbon credits. Then a funny thing happened: they began to look at the data. Once they began to actually study the phenomenon they’ve been hyping a funny thing happened, one by one they began to realize that the data didn’t support what they were talking about.
As reported in the Canada Free Press on May 16, 2007
Geologist Bruno Wiskel of the University of Alberta took a long look at the data and found that the global warming theory was full of holes and ‘red flags,’ and became convinced that humans are not responsible for rising temperatures.” Wiskel now says “the truth has to start somewhere.” He became such a skeptic that he wrote a book titled The Emperor’s New Climate: Debunking the Myth of Global Warming. Wiskel also correctly pointed out that that global warming has gone “from a science to a religion” and noted that research money is being funneled into promoting climate alarmism instead of funding areas he considers more worthy.
Astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv, one of Israel’s top young award winning scientists, recanted his belief that man made emissions were driving climate change. “”Like many others, I was personally sure that CO2 is the bad culprit in the story of global warming. But after carefully digging into the evidence, I realized that things are far more complicated than the story sold to us by many climate scientists or the stories regurgitated by the media. In fact, there is much more than meets the eye. The C02 temperature link is only incriminating circumstantial evidence. Solar activity can explain a large part of the 20th-century global warming.
Shaviv also wrote on August 18, 2006 that a colleague of his believed that “CO2 should have a large effect on climate” so “he set out to reconstruct the phanerozoic temperature. He wanted to find the CO2 signature in the data, but since there was none, he slowly had to change his views.” Shaviv believes there will be more scientists converting to man-made global warming skepticism as they discover the dearth of evidence.
Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, recently converted into a skeptic after reviewing the science and now calls global warming fears “poppycock.”
Climate scientist Dr. Chris de Freitas of The University of Auckland, N.Z., also converted from a believer in man-made global warming to a skeptic. “At first I accepted that increases in human caused additions of carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere would trigger changes in water vapor etc. and lead to dangerous ‘global warming,’ But with time and with the results of research, I formed the view that, although it makes for a good story, it is unlikely that the man-made changes are drivers of significant climate variation.”
But the number 1 story the press missed is the fact that there is no global warming. In the words of the Founder of the Weather Channel and eminent Meteorologist John Coleman:
There is no significant man made global warming. There has not been any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always changed. But mankind’s activities have not overwhelmed or significantly modified the natural forces.
Worldwide there was a significant natural warming trend in the 1980’s and 1990’s as a Solar cycle peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares. That ended in 1998 and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and the global temperatures have gone into decline. Earth has cooled for almost ten straight years.
As I’ve been saying for a very long time, there’s a huge possibility that the Sun was responsible for all the warming we’ve seen lately. New measurements from the NASA/ESA satellite Ulysses show that the sun’s activities were until recently at an all time high. In fact the sun’s solar activity has dropped to the lowest levels seen since recording began nearly 50 years ago.
Forget CO2, carbon dioxide is little more than a political ploy meant to gain control of the US’s power producing industry and make a quick buck on “carbon credits”. Carbon dioxide is a trace element, for every one million atoms of our atmosphere only 385 are carbon dioxide. That’s 385 ppm or percentage wise it’s 0.038%, barely enough to be considered a trace. In fact the air in an average busy office has 1000 times the amount of carbon dioxide with no effect on the occupants. Again John Coleman asks:
How can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth? How can a trace element possibly be the cause of systemic Global Warming? It can’t. That’s all there is to it; it can’t…. Carbon dioxide does not cause significant global warming.
Legitimate research has discovered something that SHOULD be common sense:
Now consider this: The earths temperature has been dropping for the past 10 years, and with the sun’s output at the lowest levels seen in over half a century one can properly assume that it’s only going to get colder. Where does that leave us if Barak Hussein Obama bankrupts the coal industry like he promised?
Hmmmmm?
I want a liberal to answer that question. If you’re Ben Cohen or Keith Olberman go ahead and use little words, or get help. Like that nice lady that cleans the crayon off your monitors after you’ve been composing. And if you respond in a typical liberal foul mouthed expletive festival I’ll insure the world gets to see your genius at work.