Seen in New Orleans

This just about says it all

Hey, there are people who still think crop circles are made by aliens too.

Probably the best explination for Glowarms

Larry Anderson at the American Thinker hit the nail right on the head

Worshipping TheWeather

Global Warming: The Top Storys That The Media Missed

Yeah, I figured too that if it was stamped with the moniker “Global Warming” the media would be all over it. However this story seems to have slipped through their fingers. There’s two big stories that the main stream media missed, and since they blew it so bad I decided to write the headlines for them:

Global Warming Over – Mankind Saved

And

Scientists Reject Hype, Now Studying Data

It appears that a lot of scientists just blindly followed the hype on global warming. They signed petitions, they believed the hype, they spoke out in favor of carbon credits. Then a funny thing happened: they began to look at the data. Once they began to actually study the phenomenon they’ve been hyping a funny thing happened, one by one they began to realize that the data didn’t support what they were talking about.

As reported in the Canada Free Press on May 16, 2007

Geologist Bruno Wiskel of the University of Alberta took a long look at the data and found that the global warming theory was full of holes and ‘red flags,’ and became convinced that humans are not responsible for rising temperatures.” Wiskel now says “the truth has to start somewhere.” He became such a skeptic that he wrote a book titled The Emperor’s New Climate: Debunking the Myth of Global Warming. Wiskel also correctly pointed out that that global warming has gone “from a science to a religion” and noted that research money is being funneled into promoting climate alarmism instead of funding areas he considers more worthy.

Astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv, one of Israel’s top young award winning scientists, recanted his belief that man made emissions were driving climate change. “”Like many others, I was personally sure that CO2 is the bad culprit in the story of global warming. But after carefully digging into the evidence, I realized that things are far more complicated than the story sold to us by many climate scientists or the stories regurgitated by the media. In fact, there is much more than meets the eye. The C02 temperature link is only incriminating circumstantial evidence. Solar activity can explain a large part of the 20th-century global warming.

Shaviv also wrote on August 18, 2006 that a colleague of his believed that “CO2 should have a large effect on climate” so “he set out to reconstruct the phanerozoic temperature. He wanted to find the CO2 signature in the data, but since there was none, he slowly had to change his views.”  Shaviv believes there will be more scientists converting to man-made global warming skepticism as they discover the dearth of evidence.

Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, recently converted into a skeptic after reviewing the science and now calls global warming fears “poppycock.”

Climate scientist Dr. Chris de Freitas of The University of Auckland, N.Z., also converted from a believer in man-made global warming to a skeptic. “At first I accepted that increases in human caused additions of carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere would trigger changes in water vapor etc. and lead to dangerous ‘global warming,’ But with time and with the results of research, I formed the view that, although it makes for a good story, it is unlikely that the man-made changes are drivers of significant climate variation.”

But the number 1 story the press missed is the fact that there is no global warming. In the words of the Founder of the Weather Channel and eminent Meteorologist John Coleman:

There is no significant man made global warming.  There has not been any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always changed.  But mankind’s activities have not overwhelmed or significantly modified the natural forces.

Worldwide there was a significant natural warming trend in the 1980’s and 1990’s as a Solar cycle peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares.  That ended in 1998 and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and the global temperatures have gone into decline.  Earth has cooled for almost ten straight years.

As I’ve been saying for a very long time, there’s a huge possibility that the Sun was responsible for all the warming we’ve seen lately. New measurements from the NASA/ESA satellite Ulysses show that the sun’s activities were until recently at an all time high. In fact the sun’s solar activity has dropped to the lowest levels seen since recording began nearly 50 years ago.

Forget CO2, carbon dioxide is little more than a political ploy meant to gain control of the US’s power producing industry and make a quick buck on “carbon credits”.  Carbon dioxide is a trace element, for every one million atoms of our atmosphere only 385 are carbon dioxide. That’s 385 ppm or percentage wise it’s 0.038%, barely enough to be considered a trace. In fact the air in an average busy office has 1000 times the amount of carbon dioxide with no effect on the occupants. Again John Coleman asks:

How can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth?  How can a trace element possibly be the cause of systemic Global Warming?  It can’t.  That’s all there is to it; it can’t….  Carbon dioxide does not cause significant global warming. 

Legitimate research has discovered something that SHOULD be common sense:

• Predictions of catastrophic global warming are based on computer climate models, not one of which has proven to be accurate. In fact while computer models are predicting increasing temperatures, our temperatures are actually dropping.
• Increased levels of CO2 is  beneficial to plant growth. In fact the sun’s output has dropped so much that the Ice Age panic of the 1970’s may be written down as plain good thinking.
• Major greenhouse gasses such as dihidrous monoxide (which makes up 95% of the green house gasses) substantially warm the earth while trace gasses like CO2 have no effect.
• Solar activity and earth surface temperatures are closely correlated, but surface temperature and hydrocarbon use are not.
• The Earth has been much warmer than current temperatures in the past 3,000 years with no catastrophic effects.
• Warmer weather extends growing seasons and improves the habitability of colder regions

Now consider this: The earths temperature has been dropping for the past 10 years, and with the sun’s output at the lowest levels seen in over half a century one can properly assume that it’s only going to get colder. Where does that leave us if Barak Hussein Obama bankrupts the coal industry like he promised?

Hmmmmm?

I want a liberal to answer that question. If you’re Ben Cohen or Keith Olberman go ahead and use little words, or get help. Like that nice lady that cleans the crayon off your monitors after you’ve been composing. And if you respond in a typical liberal foul mouthed expletive festival I’ll insure the world gets to see your genius at work.

Science is in Concensus: Global Warming Is Over

It’s over, shut off the lights, empty the studio. Make Al Gore sell back those worthless carbon credits. The news that the Global Warming “Crisis” is over has seemed to passed by the main stream media, but you can’t blame them. By their own admission they were working hard to get Obama elected and too busy to see what was going on beyond that. I’m guessing it’s tough for them to type with one hand.

31,000 scientists approached by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine in 2007 and 2008 signed a declaration which states to the effect that “global warming” is not a crisis and that humankind has very little influence over the climate.

That should settle it, according to Al Gore science is a big popularity contest and the more signatures you get on your petition or declaration the closer you are to the Universal Truth. Cause and effect be damned, he’s diminished science to his own private American Idol where viewers phone in to vote for their favorite hypothesis. But now more and more scientists aren’t signing his petitions, they’re actually studying the earth and drawing conclusions based on their observations rather than based on their benefactor.

For example; Al Gore bemoans that the earth’s seas are rising… and they are. However he warned of rises exceeding 20 feet, but there’s nothing in science that backs up that claim.  The sea levels have been rising for over 10,000 years, ever since the ice age ended and the glaciers began melting. For the past 10,000 years the seas have risen 400 feet at a rate of 4 feet per century, however in the 20th century the sea levels rose by less that 8 inches.

Al Gore claims that there’s been famines due to global warming, however in reality famines were caused by skyrocketing food prices. Sky rocketing food prices were caused by huge tracts of land being taken out of food production and put into biofuel production in response to Al Gore’s global warming panic. In the United states, in just 2 years over one third of all agricultural land was taken out of food production. The blood of millions of people who starved to death is on Al Gore’s hands.

Wait a minute! You say. What about global temperatures? What about the arctic ice pack?

Glad you asked. On all measures, global temperatures have been falling for seven full years since late 2001. The January-to-January fall in temperatures between 2007 and 2008 was the greatest since global temperature records were first compiled in 1880, 128 years ago. The rate of new Arctic sea-ice formation in mid-October 2008 was among the fastest since satellite records began almost 30 years ago. There has been no decline whatsoever in the total global extent of sea ice since satellite records began.

The most laughable thing about this is that Barak Hussein Obama, the second black president of the United States, believes this crap.  He claims that global warming will weaken the US Economy and threaten national security, but in reality his scatterbrained scheme of cutting 80-90% of US carbon emissions and bankrupting the coal industry will do that without even having to look at the thermometer. In fact responsponsible scientists insist that a warming of 2 degrees with increase agricultural output.

Thanks liberals, you voted for Frederick Douglass but instead handed us Daffy Duck.